Re: One more try Here is conclusive proof of kpaul's thesis
Look, doofus, here is what you wrote:
"Largest home ownership during Clinton years due to balance budgets causing lower interest rates."
The fact is that the record for home ownership was set in 2004, and only slightly lower in 2005.
Clinton was not President in 2004 or 2005.
Your "lag theory" is irrelevant to the fact that your assertion is factually wrong. It serves only to attempt to deflect attention from that fact. And it is more useless garbage because you will define the length of the "lag" to be the point at which it "proves" your theory, whether that is six months or six years. And (to remind you once again in my desperate attempts to get through your ADHD fog) it is still irrelevant to your factually wrong statements about home ownership and interest rates during the Clinton administration.