Considering you can't even pull the trigger to purchase a Triumph or VFR or 8 Ball or whatever your next bike is, what makes any of us think you'll pony up the $1500 it would take to buy MO?
Dayum! KP takes the prize! I figured LongRide, the pride of Chicago, had the best chance.
"Oglethorpe!"
"Puttin' on the foil coach!"
"Old time hockey!"
"You go in box and they close door and you feel shame"
Awesome stuff!
BTW, rumor has it that if MO wins the motojounalist GP, we'll be bought by a rich motorcycle enthusiast from Florida and that our new offices will be in South Beach where gorgeous Cuban girls will "polish our helmets" after every ride. Chant along with me MOrons, "GO SEAN GO! GO SEAN GO!"
Ok Ok but I like the new ZX-6R. Even Buz knows that the 600 and more specifically Kawasaki is the pinnacle of motorcycles. Why would I get something inferior.
The literbikes also have lower gearing, I believe.
A fair point. However, the litrebikes still seem to have better roll on times than the Busas/Blackbirds/etc, which was the original comment.
Which makes such testing pointless
Most performance comparison testing is pointless. For streetbikes, who cares if one bike is 0.4 second faster 0-60, or if another is 0.6 sec faster in a roll on? It's all really academic.
Personally, if a bike is capable of the 1/4 in the 12s or less I think that it's more than enough for the real world. Who really rides around at WFO anyways?
Of course magazines need objective means of distinguishing bikes, and performance tests are a way of doing just that. {shrug}
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could
be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Motorcycle Forums
A forum community dedicated to all motorcycle owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about performance, reviews, modifications, classifieds, maintenance, and more!