Sorry, we can't find the page you requested.Please try one of the following to find the page you are looking for.
ERROR 404
ERROR 404
FINE!Error 405: None of your Damn Business.
So you want to see this page. You can't. It's not yours, it's OURS, and we let only who we like see it, and we don't like you. Now Beat It!
Remember, Suzuki had that lame MeanStreak rip-off for about a year and I think Kawasaki had a V-strom rip-off in their European line up for a season also.I remember hearing about that what..a year ago or more? They seem to be competing in almost every other segement though; Blvd. vs. Vulcan, 'Busa vs. ZX-14, Ninja vs. GSXR etc. I dunno, seems possible.
Aw, jeez, you guys are no fun. Go for the conspiracy I say. We all know how well businesses cooperate and would never take advantage over a competitor.Remember, Suzuki had that lame MeanStreak rip-off for about a year and I think Kawasaki had a V-strom rip-off in their European line up for a season also.
Ok, here goes. Kawasaki and Suzuki both have cheap 250hp machines that get 150mpg that they can make a profit on and still only sell them for $2500 a piece, but they know it will destroy the market so they have decided to shelve the models for another several decades while they allow for the current outdated models to sell because Honda (who actually owns every motorcycle company, which is why they no longer produce new models) wants to push out more outdated VFRs and RC51s with outdated engine development. All the while they get support funding from "big oil" contracts that encourage them to delay the already developed "future bikes" to continue to produce machines that get a third of the gas efficiency. Which is a direct link to why Microsoft allows operating systems to be released with security risks as the Chem Trails from jet airliners release chemical weapons on the public for testing and development.Aw, jeez, you guys are no fun. Go for the conspiracy I say. We all know how well businesses cooperate and would never take advantage over a competitor.
You didn't work Bush in there somehow, but I think you got the rest of them pretty good.Ok, here goes. Kawasaki and Suzuki both have cheap 250hp machines that get 150mpg that they can make a profit on and still only sell them for $2500 a piece, but they know it will destroy the market so they have decided to shelve the models for another several decades while they allow for the current outdated models to sell because Honda (who actually owns every motorcycle company, which is why they no longer produce new models) wants to push out more outdated VFRs and RC51s with outdated engine development. All the while they get support funding from "big oil" contracts that encourage them to delay the already developed "future bikes" to continue to produce machines that get a third of the gas efficiency. Which is a direct link to why Microsoft allows operating systems to be released with security risks as the Chem Trails from jet airliners release chemical weapons on the public for testing and development.
How's that?
I thought it was obvious; Bush is an evil robot that was created by Harley Davidson and Microsoft just after HD went public back in the 80's. It was part of the agreement issued by Charles Schwab and a Swedish Prime Minister that had delusions of grandeur of resurrecting the Ace Motor Corporation an issue in a new ear of Indian Fours.You didn't work Bush in there somehow, but I think you got the rest of them pretty good.
Actually the V-strom rip-off wasn't a rip-off, but actually a Kawi-Suzuki collaboration, so it was technically the same bike.Remember, Suzuki had that lame MeanStreak rip-off for about a year and I think Kawasaki had a V-strom rip-off in their European line up for a season also.
In the end, it didn't matter. How was it perceived? Why was it dropped?Actually the V-strom rip-off wasn't a rip-off, but actually a Kawi-Suzuki collaboration, so it was technically the same bike.