Motorcycle Forums banner
1 - 20 of 52 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
154 Posts
anything new and different is fun to see, but its going to be expensive, weak performance for the money, etc.



I'd be curious who buys these and why they choose it over other bikes.



looks good though
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
29 Posts
It will probably cost less than ten grand, have adequate power (80hp), good handling , hard bags (I hope), and the aftermarket support that BMWs enjoy.

I doubt,however, that it will have much of the overall goodness of an Airhead. This will be an entry level Beemer without the over-engineering and gadgetry that has come to characterize that brand.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,833 Posts
As a long time BMW rider I lament the passing of the airhead and its replacement with the overly complex and porcine bikes that BMW has offered since. Let's hope that this model will usher in a new commitment to the production of lighter, simpler motorcycles. VWW
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
29 Posts
Parallel twins are inherently impossible to balance. This is the reason why so many great British bikes from the glorious era kept self destructing.

This one may not self destruct, thanks to 50 years of progress in engineering, electronics, metals, and other details, but it will still shake like a cub scout at Neverland (who did I steal that from?).

 

·
Registered
Joined
·
57 Posts
Geesh, I have a F650CS, it is far from porcine, it is simple and light and super easy to ride and has been my favorite motorcycle I have owned. It is also low maintenance. The F650 series has been around awhile now.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
57 Posts
BMW already has an F650CS and GS, they are thin, light, have ABS option and the CS is belt drive so no chain oiling. The gas is below the seat so it feels more scooter size than motorcycle so for me it is a hoot in LA traffic, in fact it is my primary LA transport.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
57 Posts
Well after I found out the F650CS was discontinued I was hoping for something even lighter and smaller, a BMW standard/motard. Looks like they decided to go more sporty as they have with their other bikes. Looks like they kept the single sided swing arm, which is good, hope they kept the belt drive from the CS vs a chain. I also hope they kept the gas under the seat, but it looks like they ditched the storage tank and put on a traditional gas tank :( Handle bars look like clip-ons vs the more comfy standard style bars the CS has now. In general I am disappointed as BMW no longer has a beginner friendly standard any more.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
145 Posts
Are you kidding? One word: COUNTERBALANCERS. The modern triumph Bonneville engine family has them, as does EVERY modern parallel twin, such as the Yamaha TDM, MZ 1000S, Kawasaki ER6, and certainly this BMW 800. I bet it'll be smooth as silk. Remember, IT'S A BMW.



For what it's worth, I've ridden 197os era Kawaski KZ750 twins, and those are pretty smooth too.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
208 Posts
I think ABS will be the primary reason folks pick this bike over other better bang-per-buck bikes. I'm eager to read some reviews on the bike, and I applaud BMW for at least trying to fill the void between its thumper and uberbikes. However, as you mentioned, the costs will be the deal breaker.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
325 Posts
I read that the 800s are not the replacements for the singles. They are meant to be more of a mid-level BMW. I also read that a new single would be launched next fall.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
458 Posts
Fugly...

You do realize, if it was called a "Ninja 800r", people would complain about the fugly/bland front...

Nice bike. Pitty its going to be WAYYY too expensive. Get a Ninja 650 ABS instead. Oh wait, its only europe that gets the ABS...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
458 Posts
Complain to kawasaki...

The Kawasaki ER-6n/Ninja 650 has a ~$500 ABS option... In EUROPE.

Complain to Kawasaki the next time you see them, saying you want the ABS option here.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
458 Posts
The CS when I rode it jsut felt underpowered. Actually, it has "enuf" power. But it really would have been much better with 60-70hp (a twin) rather than the 35-40 hp (single).

 
1 - 20 of 52 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top