Motorcycle Forums banner
1 - 15 of 15 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
265 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Uno, ein, #1!



Sounds like the kind of "help" HD dealers are famous for. And I used to work for and was sponsored by a Harley dealer back in 51 & 52. Fifty years ago, all the Harley dealers I knew were great. I guess times and attitudes have changed.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1 Posts
I like the 1998 S3t the best, it had the thunderstorm motor and was the last year with a carb. 1999 and up were all injected and the FI system has some issues. Also think about getting a "t" model. the S3t came with matching painted hard bags.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,640 Posts
I remember shopping for a S3T. I went to the Int'l M/C Show in Atlanta, and the Buell exhibit was across the aisle from the Triumph display (back when they did that kind of thing).



I sat upon a blue S3T. It looked ok. I then saw the Sprint ST, also blue, directly in front of me. Went, sat, was smitten.



The Triumph looked so much better in fit and finish, it made the Buell look home-made.



Then I rode a Sprint, and heard that Triple howl! Hooo-wee!



And, the Sprint was cheaper than the S3T.



IMHO, the only advantages the S3T had over the Sprint were the hydraulic lifters and the belt drive. And they have a better selection of t-shirts.



I'm riding my second ST (an '03), and love it!



HTH!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
158 Posts
I owned both bikes,and each one had issues.

2000 Sprint RS I had was not sorted out in the fuel injection.I would just not idle some times.Also,it had a small amount of vibes in handlebar that numbed my hands.Handling was terrific.

My buell ,2000 also,had a cylinder gasket that needed replacement-under warranty,

Fun bike.

The only bike that I that I truly missed when we parted company was my 2001 ST2 DUCATI.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
61 Posts
You should also consider a Cyclone (M2), if you don't need the touring features of the S3T. No fuel injection issues (it's carburated), and it's actually quicker that the other models to about sixty...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
514 Posts
I second this.... definitely ask your questions over there.



there are a few people with funny extremist-nut-job politics over there but they mostly keep that stuff out o fht emotorcycle-related discussion



as far as motorcycle knowledge and people willing to offer really expert advice BadWeb is probably the best special interest bike community site on the internet.





 

·
Registered
Joined
·
70 Posts
I own a 2001 Cyclone - and I would tell you that reliability is not it's forte. Mine, at 25,000 miles, just had it's 25,000 mile service done, and by the time it is all done and finished, and after three visits..., it will have cost me $1500 to put this beast back on the road. The latest of problems was the bi-yearly broken motor mount which severed some oil lines, all of which had to be ordered, as Buell parts are seldom kept in stock, especially for the older ones, etc., etc. . If you are a mechanic, most of these are easy repairs, as nothing inside the engine has ever busted - but these bikes are weak electrically, and where the frame meets the engine. Good luck!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,030 Posts
there are a few people with funny extremist-nut-job politics over there but they mostly keep that stuff out o fht emotorcycle-related di"scussion"



Our politically-extremist nut jobs could use a lesson.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6 Posts
hi,

Thanks for the input on a cyclone.

I haven't ever been able to sit on one.

Do they have a more upright seating position like the S3T or a more race like position like a lightning?

The thing of it is I'm 6'2" 230lbs my wife is 6' 130 lbs.

I need a bike with a little room on it. That is why I'm looking at the S3 or S3T. Maybe the cyclone is just as big as the S3. I just have never seen one. My buddy has a white lightning (steel frame, don't know year) and I like riding his bike for a while but I can't get my wife and I on it.

Do you think a cyclone would fit??

Thank-you for any help
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
61 Posts
The Cyclone riding position is more upright than the tube-framed Lightning, but not as upright as the S3T. Since it doesn't have a fairing (just a small but effective flyscreen), that's probably good. Leg room is excellent. For two-up, forget it.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
70 Posts
Cyclone has a much more uprioght seating position. Especially mine, as I put the S3's handlebars on it! I am 5' 10" and 230 lbs., and it works for me, as far as the space. At your height, try it on for size first. As for Comfort, go to Corbin, and check out the saddles they have for the Cyclone. They even have one that you can have a backrest for the passenger seat, that can be removed, if desired. Very Comfortable. Very Wide, for a sportbike, for the pilot, and my girlfriend at 5' 10" never complains about the rear seat. I originally bought the cyclone because it's seat was much wider than other sportbikes... I am on my second saddle now and would not ride this bike without it. Good Luck!
 
1 - 15 of 15 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top