Motorcycle Forums banner
21 - 40 of 58 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
7,113 Posts

· Super Duper Mod Man
Joined
·
10,479 Posts
"And, and, and, this is...sniff...sniff..PERSONAL...cause it's..it's...IMPORTANT...and, and, and, I figured you were gonna just nominate ME...cause it's my turn and all...sniff..sniff...sniff. It's because he's BLACK, ISN'T IT???"
You know, at first, I thought it was kind of dumb what she did, but now I realized she is just falling back on what she knows. It probably worked on old Billy Boy so many times, she figured it might work here! :-D
 

· The Toad
Joined
·
17,448 Posts
Yeah.

You know, at first, I thought it was kind of dumb what she did, but now I realized she is just falling back on what she knows. It probably worked on old Billy Boy so many times, she figured it might work here! :-D
Just imagine how well those tactics will work on Putin, Achmedummy, Osama bin Laden, Chavez, etc etc.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
11,481 Posts
Just imagine how well those tactics will work on Putin, Achmedummy, Osama bin Laden, Chavez, etc etc.
Well, they might if she looked like Marilyn Monroe.............
 

· The Toad
Joined
·
17,448 Posts
That don't....

"Not that there's anything WRONG with that."
... bother me a bit. I'm one too. Hopelessly trapped in a male body. Compelled to slobber uncontrollably whenever I see a photo of Catherine Bell in a swim suit. It's hell I tell ya!

Hillary's seances and messiah-complex are another matter. And somehow I doubt that the USA is ready for her stalinist purges yet. Though when I check up on the crazies at DailyKos or FreeRepublic it looks like purges may be closer than I think.

All I can say is that Barak better stay away from Ft Marcy Park!
 

· Registered
Joined
·
11,481 Posts
Well, they might if she looked like Marilyn Monroe.............

Last edited by sachiwilson : Today at 09:29 AM. Reason: Knock it off, bucko
No, YOU knock it off, sachi - I'm just about fed-up with your censorship of every little thing I type that you feel is the least-F'n bit outside of Politically Correct.

Get this - I'M NOT POLITICALLY CORRECT, AND NEITHER ARE MY POSTS.

You edit my posts, because you know there's nothing I can do about it. But, when another MOD says something worse, they get a 'Bye. Why you s'pose dat be's?

Stick to the forum you're Moderator of - and leave me the Hell alone.

And my name isn't "Bucko", nor am I some child you must chide for naughty behaviour. However, your own childish behaviour might need a bit of correction.

You've already proven your "Kpaul point". Whether he deserved being booted or not, he's gone, you're bored, and this will probably be deleted (but worry not! - it's being CC'd to admin!)
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,609 Posts
"Political correctness" is always trotted out when someone is challenged on a post that is offensive and demeaning. But there it is -- the language was offensive and demeaning, and I deleted it as a result. It is regrettable that you think you have a right to post such language, or that you should feel I am picking on you because you do. I would have deleted that language no matter who posts it. I have deleted other offensive posts or language as well. It's not about you, Airhawk, and if you don't like having me mod your posts I suggest you take some care in your choice of language in the future.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
11,481 Posts
"Political correctness" is always trotted out when someone is challenged on a post that is offensive and demeaning.
Ironic, the off-topic subject was Politics..........

Go Figure.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
11,481 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
553 Posts
"Political correctness" is always trotted out when someone is challenged on a post that is offensive and demeaning.
Okay, but you can't deny that "offensive and demeaning" are highly subjective terms. Not having had the opportunity to see the original message I'm not in a position to agree or disagree with your assessment but I would hope that if you're going to take the time to censor a user you'd give them a less flippant explanation. Preferably one that sites a clearly stated part of some user agreement each person is obliged to accept in order to be a member of the site. Otherwise, regardless of intent or likely agreement, you leave the impression that you are being petty and tyrannical.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
11,481 Posts
Okay, but you can't deny that "offensive and demeaning" are highly subjective terms. Not having had the opportunity to see the original message I'm not in a position to agree or disagree with your assessment but I would hope that if you're going to take the time to censor a user you'd give them a less flippant explanation. Preferably one that sites a clearly stated part of some user agreement each person is obliged to accept in order to be a member of the site. Otherwise, regardless of intent or likely agreement, you leave the impression that you are being petty and tyrannical.
I insinuated Hillary Clinton was a Lesbian, but claimed that would be no deterrent to my having sex with her, if proffered.

In vulgar terms. (i.e. - not "Politically Correct", and phrased in vulgar vernacular, or "common speech"). No Profanity involved.
 
21 - 40 of 58 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top