Motorcycle Forums banner
41 - 60 of 71 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
11,491 Posts
!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
11,491 Posts
,
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
320 Posts
"can produce more horsepower and torque than the TC 88 for a given cylinder volume."



Let me guess, you own an EVO?



Sorry, Bud but that statement is patently untrue. The TC88 mill was also specifically designed be easily souped up to double its stock power output where as the EVO was not.



The EVO STOCK head does flow better than the TC88 STOCK head, but that doesn't mean anything by it's self.
 

·
Super Duper Mod Man
Joined
·
10,479 Posts
Re: A 10-YEAR LOAN ON A BIKE?!

He wants advice on buying a TwinCam or Evo. If he wanted a rolling piece of metric shyt, I'm sure you would be the expert on that subject. Maybe you could tell him the best junkyards to dump it.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
10 Posts
One thing to consider:



The '97 Evo, as you said, is sorted out. Everything works great and the aftermarket is massive.



The '02 TC88 was the 4th production year for an engine that is no longer produced. As of '07 the TC88 is gone. The new and improved TC96 is a very different engine.



As for re-sale value, the Evo has done its depreciating. The now obsolete TC88 has just begun to lose its value.



 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,125 Posts
Re: Evo v Twin Cam Dyna - My 2P worth

I'm going to vote for the EVO based on the fact that you plan on keeping it at least a decade. When I bought my '70 Triumph TR6 in '75 there were shops everywhere and plenty of parts. By the '80s we went through a shortage of spares and I thought that would be the end of keeping my Triumph. It all turned around by the '90s and every part is available and it potters along just fine. It's the parking lot here at work.

That's the case now with the EVO. You will never be in need of a part for that bike. I'm not sure about the '02 TC since HD is still trying to sort out the cams and balance system on that motor. There are several iterations of the twin cam in a short few years that wasn't so much the case with the EVOs.

But, if you pass up the Twin Cam you will miss the balanced motor and more stock power.

As for uprating the EVO. What's not available? The motor is solid and well engineered. At 83K miles I'm still on the original belt, clutch, bottom end, tranny etc. I did a top end rebuild at 75K, but only because I had the motor apart to replace one lifter.

One last comment. The '97 EVO is 10 years old now and if you were here in the States the HD dealer will be blowing you off, or gouging you for every part. With the Twin Cam you won't need to see the parts dealer and they still have whatever you need in stock.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,030 Posts
Re: Go for it. You deserve it.

"And as i 've said elsewhere, no bike puts a smile across my face like a harley ..so what the hell!"

You just identified the only spec that matters when buying a bike. Good luck to you!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,331 Posts
Chicks dig the KLR?

Where are all the pics of pictures of hot chicks gathering around to look at the KLR?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
10,904 Posts
Re: Evo v Twin Cam Dyna - My 2P worth

Just nit picking but the TC motor on the Dyna and Touring bikes is not balanced. It's rubber mounted.

The TC88B is available on softtails only. It's solid mounted in that chassis.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
11,491 Posts
That's what I thought.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
11,491 Posts
How much would a new TC96 cost for an "upgrade"? Or rather, new jugs and pistons, cams, etc.



Are the engines different enough that an 88 couldn't be made into a 96 easily?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
11,491 Posts
¶‡•Þ~
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
409 Posts
Well, here is one thing to consider. The '97 is very close to the cut off for service at the H-D dealer. Some already refuse to work on Evo's as they are too old. So unless you are going to work on it yourself or have a trusted mechanic, go with the Twin Cam. Personally, I own one of each...the Evo hasn't left me on the side of the road yet (neither has the TC).
 
41 - 60 of 71 Posts
Top