POS Antiquated Buell Motor
Mr. Bass laments...
"#2 Buell. Kind of racy. Sounds cool. Plenty of pull with the motor.
Vibration would probably get old, trying to hang onto the bars for long stretches and never being able to make out a single object in the mirror. Front brake is awesome, could probably throw you over the bars if you weren't careful.
That HD motor is just too antiquated to get very excited about. "
Mr. Bass apparently does not appreciate the finer points of a modern air cooled V-Twin with hydraulic lifters and a mere two valves per cylinder. He apparently missed the fact that such an engine is far more efficient than any other comparably powered motorcycle engine on the market... can you say 60+ mpg highway?... and far more powerful than any comparably configured street motor on the market. The Buell engine has by far the widest power-band. Darn that antique engine with it's old fashioned roller instead of journal bearings. Darn that old fahsioned engine with it's slim compact 45 degree "V" configuration. Mr. Bass also fails to appreciate that unlike most of its contemporaries, the Buell engine never needs valve lash adjustments, a significant factor for those of us who actually put some serious miles on our motorcycles.
Nor does Mr. Bass recognize the superiority of the antiquated Buell engine with respect to emissions... How advanced is an engine that cannot meet emissions requirements without making use of a catalytic converter? The Buell engine meets emissions requirements without one. The others?
Maybe the new advanced engines aren't so new or advanced after all? Maybe someone who is supposed to be reporting on the virtues and/or vices of three motorcycles needs to learn a thing or two about motorcycle engines instead of regurgitating information assimilated from the trough of ignorance?
It is unfortunate that the type of misinformation and bias that Mr. Bass exhibits is also common within the rest of the moto-journalistic arena.
Likewise on the vibration. Mr. Bass is apparently confusing the ultra-smooth ride at speed of the Buell with another bike. It certainly vibes and shakes at idle. As others so adeptly reported in the same article however, it smooths once at speed. Got your facts straight Mr. Bass? When it comes to vibration while riding, maybe you are confusing your notes on the BMW with those of the Buell?
Overall, you guys put out another great article. I do agree that the Duc 1000SS would have made a better more fair comparison bike and would also love to see the new Guzzi sport bike included too... Maybe next time ALL the stars and planets will align. Keep up the great work.
Blake (Yes, I am a big Buell fan from way back. I am an avid Buell owner/rider/amateur racer and general Buell American Motorcycle enthusiast -
www.badweatherbikers.com)
PS: You cannot go wrong with any of the three bikes tested, they are each exceptional values in their own niche, but if you are in the market for an XB12R or XB12S, you might pass Mr. Bass' comments through the objectivity filter.
PSS: The published MO Buell dyno results seem to cut off well short of the XB12R's stated 6,800 rev limit and peak HP. Looks like it would have easily broken through the 90 rwhp mark had it been run to the rev limit.