Motorcycle Forums banner

Helmet Laws Suck

30134 Views 113 Replies 21 Participants Last post by  Kenneth_Moore
Suggesting that riding without a helmet is a good idea is, in most circles, about as popular as proposing a “Crack for Kids” program at the local School Board meeting. People get pretty agitated, and tend to think you’re out to undermine the very foundation of society. Regardless of that, I think riding without a helmet can be worth the risk, and I want to say so. If your mind is made up, you might as well skip the rest of this rant and move on. If you want to talk about it, I’d enjoy hearing your opinions.

I literally grew up wearing helmets. They were mandatory in Florida long before I could ride a motorcycle, legally or otherwise. The first bike I rode was a Honda 150 back in 1968; I used to borrow it from a friend and ride it around the neighborhood at the age of 12. I always borrowed the guy’s helmet too. About 4 years later I got my first tickets on two wheels when I borrowed a guy’s moped and rode it down a dirt road at a park. The cop decided to teach me a lesson and wrote me for no helmet, no license plate, no turn signals, and no registration. That incident clearly set the stage for my future relationship with the Florida DMV, but that’s another rant.

Not long after that incident, I got my first real bike, a Yamaha RD-350 in black and orange. The guy I bought it from gave me the standard helmet of the day, open front with the three snaps across the top to secure a face shield. I think it was purple with metal flake. I bought this goofy bubble-shaped hard plastic shield in yellow, which for some reason I thought was really cool. Not long after that, I got to borrow my friends Bell full-face helmet (back in those days Bell was synonymous with full-faced helmets, at least with the guys I hung out with) and from that point on, that’s what I wore. Eventually I settled on Shoei, and always got white ones to try to keep the heat down. And, in fact, when I do wear a helmet these days, that’s what I still wear.

As the years went by, I was peripherally aware of ABATE, the nationwide anti-helmet law organization. Originally their initials stood for “A Brotherhood Against Totalitarian Enactments,” but once the 70’s were over they toned it down to “American Bikers Aimed Toward Education.” Or something like that depending on what state you're in. They had fund raising events, lobbied the Legislature and Governor, and had an annual ride to Tallahassee to try to get the helmet law repealed, or at least modified. Back in the summer of 2000, they finally succeeded. The law wasn’t repealed, but it was changed to allow riders over 21 to ride without a helmet as long as they had a special $10,000 medical insurance policy to cover the cost of stuffing their brains back in their heads after an accident. Two interesting notes here: nobody could find any insurance company that offered this policy, and nobody could clearly explain what the heck this caveat really meant, so de-facto, the clause was meaningless. The other interesting side note is ABATE. Not long after the law was passed, I met a member handing out flyers for another fund raiser at one of the local motorcycle parts stores. When I asked what the heck they were collecting money for since they’d won, she looked confused and said: “well, they may change their minds!” Frankly, I think she was simply proving the “Iron Law of Oligarchy,” which essentially states that no matter what an organization is formed for initially; eventually its purpose becomes its own continuation, growth, and the aggrandizement of its leadership.

When the new law was announced, I said to myself and others that I’d never ride without a helmet. I reasoned that it would be pointlessly risky, and I didn’t want to end up a vegetable, disfigured, or dead. But it didn’t take too long before “it” happened. I tasted the forbidden fruit. I’ve forgotten exactly when, where, or why I wound up riding without a helmet, but I did. I loved it. I didn't want to wear a helmet any more.

I decided to try a small helmet instead of a full-face one to see if I could get the same feeling I had with no helmet. It was better, but still not the same. The only downside I found was the rain. I cannot ride without a helmet and face shield in the rain, it just hurts too much. I’ve always worn earplugs when I ride, so the wind noise without a helmet is manageable.

I don’t always ride without a helmet. In addition to rainy conditions, I usually wear a helmet during commuting hours, long trips at high speeds, and when it’s cold out. But last night I took a ride under the stars without, and I will say this: for me, that ride without the helmet was far more enjoyable than it would have been with. I can’t explain it, any more than I can explain to a cager why I take the risks of riding a motorcycle at all, versus just getting in the car. And, as I rode along last night, I decided to write this and share my thoughts.

So, here it is: I suggest that if you ever get the chance, take off your helmet and give it a try. If you’ve never done it, you might be surprised. And if you splatter your brains all over the highway, don’t blame me. It is, after all, just a suggestion. To paraphrase Robert A. Heinlein, “a zest for living requires a willingness to die.”

PS: I suspect my fun will end soon. I can’t imagine this society of ours allowing this type of individual choice for too much longer. Frankly, I was stunned when the law was repealed. I'm sure the Feds will link mandatory helmet laws to highway funding or something.
See less See more
61 - 80 of 114 Posts
I'm Done

It's our own fault we are in this situation. Those that think our elective system is rigged don't vote (which consist of nearly half the country). Those that do vote keep the same slags in office no matter the performance. If they were heads of Industry they'd be fired for their performance. Just something to chew on.
Well there you go! I agree with you word for word on the above!

So, whaddya think of them motorcycle thingys? Reckon they're gonna catch on one of these days?
To recap quickly here, helmet laws suck and government handouts suck worse. All the helmet laws in the world won't lower your insurance rates, you medical payments, nor will they lower your tax bill. Look elsewhere for that relief. Ride free! Over and Out!
So?

And therein lies the difference. I think the vast majority of people are better off today than at any time in America's history. You said it yourself: you got motivated and you were able to build a terrific life for yourself! Did you know people were starving to death in the 30's when Roosevelt started the New Deal?
People were fed by local and State programs. Not the New Deal.

The successor of the New Deal, the Great Society has been an unmitigated disaster and virtually destroyed entire cities. Yeah. Let's do more of that big govt solution shyt. It works really well.
People were fed by local and State programs. Not the New Deal.

The successor of the New Deal, the Great Society has been an unmitigated disaster and virtually destroyed entire cities. Yeah. Let's do more of that big govt solution shyt. It works really well.
I'm really thinking hard about getting that Concours 14. Man, it looked great in the showroom! But, the old one is running pretty darn good and it's hard to imagine going the financing route on a bike. I could sell one or both of the "vintage" bikes to minimize the payments...but I'd hate myself for letting that 77 FXS go. I guess it's a good problem to have!
I'm out after this- promise

People were fed by local and State programs. Not the New Deal.

The successor of the New Deal, the Great Society has been an unmitigated disaster and virtually destroyed entire cities. Yeah. Let's do more of that big govt solution shyt. It works really well.
You have just stated my point. The Federal Gov't should not be involved with these programs at all, unless it's providing matching funds for a state run program (which will have far less devistating effects on the economy). It should be up to the individual states to support or not to support any welfare type system. That way those that are locally elected can actually be held accountable when, or if, the system implodes. Keep it local. Give people a choice (by vote) to have or deny access to programs. Let the people live in the states that most suit their needs. I'm sure you Californians would be over-run sooner than later.
There is this old myth in the States that you guys have greater personal freedoms than us in Europe. Land of the free. Gun wise you have that, ok, but in reality you can’t drink openly in the beaches and parks and the cops can seach your trunk withour a search warrant. Nowadays cops can wiretap you on whim and enter your house without you never knowing. You can’t even publicly swim naked. Tsk tsk. Why couldn’t you read a porn mag in the presence of a female coworker?

- cruiz-euro
Yeah well...

There is this old myth in the States that you guys have greater personal freedoms than us in Europe. Land of the free. Gun wise you have that, ok, but in reality you can't drink openly in the beaches and parks and the cops can seach your trunk withour a search warrant. Nowadays cops can wiretap you on whim and enter your house without you never knowing. You can't even publicly swim naked. Tsk tsk. Why couldn't you read a porn mag in the presence of a female coworker?

- cruiz-euro
.... at least they can't put us on probation before we commit a crime.

But your point is well taken. Americans seem to love to run to their govt to oppress their neighbors. At least we don't murder the elderly because of a lack of dialysis machines.
No, no, no. The government is good for you. Go to the government. Trust the government. The government knows best.

If you fear government involvement you are paranoid.

The government should limit all bikes to a speed no greater than 65mph. You don't need to go faster than that. If you disagree you will be sited for antisocial behavior and an ankle monitor will be provided to monitor your movement and fat intake.
I live in WA state and we have a helmet law. I dislike it. Riding without a helmet is like riding in a convertable with the top down. Something about 'an open view' to the world making life more relaxing. I also like riding in the bed of a pickup, same feeling. I agree that helmets do help protect and so does the clothing one wears. But what cracks me up about the law is that you can wear a t-shirt and shorts while riding. (conspiracy theory sprouting) Makes me wonder if there is a 'vested' interest in having specific DOT approved helmets sold... Can you imagine DOT approved clothing too??? The revenue that would be generated!!! Anyways, I prefer choice. I am always willing to accept the outcomes of my choice...
helmet

If you want proof of how effective wearing a helmet can be, have a friend put one on, and then smash his head against the wall. Now have him remove the helmet and try it again. Which one do you think he will prefer
How about if we prove how effective driving a cage can be. How about hitting a brick wall at 40mph with your motorcycle, and then do the same with your 5 star crash rated auto. Which one do you think you would prefer? Oh yeah, you can wear your helmet during the test on the bike too! So we sould have car laws now?
If you want proof of how effective wearing a helmet can be, have a friend put one on, and then smash his head against the wall. Now have him remove the helmet and try it again. Which one do you think he will prefer
Hey There jimmy bob! I just checked on the internets. Helmet laws still suck.
Hey There jimmy bob! I just checked on the internets. Helmet laws still suck.
I'd bet that skiers are a greater burden on public health care costs than motorcyclists BY FAR.

Here's why:

Motorcyclist - All drivers are required by law to carry insurance. So if a biker gets hurt he's quite likely to be covered.

Skiers - No insurance requirements. You should see the packed buses of deadbeat college strudents on their way to cheap ski days courtesy of student discounts. They even sell liquor at the resorts. Any bum can pay a few bucks and run into a tree and end up paraplegic or quadraplegic... and often do. The numbers of deadbeat skiers are appalling as any hospital collection office will tell you.

And how about ATVers? These people fill the emergency rooms in the summer. Yet where are the outcries to deny them any public assistance if hurt while riding without helmets? They aren't required to have insurance.

One can only conclude that the belief so common amongst people that only motorcyclists are to be singled out for govt oppression because of their "dangerous" pastime is evidence of mental illness. It is vicious and irrational to single out bikers like this. After all the biggest cause of death in auto accidents is.... head injuries. Where's the outrage?

Helmet law fascists can all DIAF/PC. Or better yet. Hit in the head by a falling chunk of blue ice from a passing airliner.... shoulda worn a helmet dude!
See less See more
Hey There jimmy bob! I just checked on the internets. Helmet laws still suck.
Helmets prevent Global Warming.
Helmets prevent Global Warming.
You don't give a hoot, do you?
You don't give a hoot, do you?
I work from home and only drive about 5-10 mile a week.
I don't use city water (well).
I have over 120 energy efficient bulbs in the house.
We have an energy efficient washer and dryer.
My house is 267 years old and made of field stone, horse hair and mud(if that isn't recycling, I don't know what is)
All of our vegetables are from local markets.
Most of our meat and poultry is from the local butcher and ranches.
We have a compost mound to cut down on garbage waste.
We are installing two wood burning stoves in August to cut down on oil consumption by 75%.
We will be installing Geothermal Heating/Cooling in the next 5-10 years (sorry, it's a bit expensive)

And, no, I do not believe in Global Warming. I do more than 70-80% of the population in terms of being efficient when it comes to daily consumption, but yet, I am still "dumb" for not believing in Global Warming".

Figures.
See less See more
Just think what could be accomplished if we could get Al Gore to follow your example!
You don't give a hoot, do you?
Well, I DO give a hoot. I always hoot the enviro-nuts. 90% of whom use more electricity than I do. I have some solar power, you see.

I just don't give a f()ck.
Well, I DO give a hoot. I always hoot the enviro-nuts. 90% of whom use more electricity than I do. I have some solar power, you see.

I just don't give a f()ck.
I've been looking into some wind power. Some do-it-yourself kits. We get a good amount of wind here. Do I think it will reduce my energy bill greatly? Probably not.

But, if I can get that working I will set up a large scale version on the land in Northern Arizona. I get more wind over there.
I've been looking into some wind power. Some do-it-yourself kits. We get a good amount of wind here. Do I think it will reduce my energy bill greatly? Probably not.

But, if I can get that working I will set up a large scale version on the land in Northern Arizona. I get more wind over there.
We don't get enough steady wind. I use solar cells and 12V battery storage to power my cabin. At home we bought a new furnace and tankless water heater and even xeriscaped half the property to conserve water. The funny thing is that none, absolutely none, of my wife's very liberal hypocrite relatives have done any of those things. They don't vanpool or commute on buses or motorcycles. My lefty "tax the rich" niece lives 5 minutes from a light rail stop but drives to the University each day because otherwise it takes "too long".

I guess that voting a certain way makes up for all sorts of personal hypocrisy.
61 - 80 of 114 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top