Joined
·
441 Posts
Good for TX!
That medical insurance requirement sure is counterintuitive, though. California's Highway Patrol believes it's safer to split lanes than it is to sit in rush-hour traffic. (At least that's what they told us in MSF school.)
If it's more dangerous NOT to split lanes, then why the insurance req for splitters?
That medical insurance requirement sure is counterintuitive, though. California's Highway Patrol believes it's safer to split lanes than it is to sit in rush-hour traffic. (At least that's what they told us in MSF school.)
If it's more dangerous NOT to split lanes, then why the insurance req for splitters?
