[sarnali]

Re:typical

the usual missinformation and B.S. from "sarge" and Mr. Cote

My basic argument with this (re-current) issue is why do you want to prevent someone from failing to protect a brain that's too stupid to want to protect itself?

I think helmets and seatbelts should be optional, that way Darwinian theory proves itself by allowing the lesser intellegent to remove themselves from the gene pool, thus ensuring those with higher level of intellegence and superior survival instincts will prosper.

 

[sarnali]

Re:typical

Might roll over when I have to swerve to avoid one of them foreign cars that stop in less than 350 feet. We can go round about this all night, and you've been riding long enough to know how this schit works.

The only times motorcycles are more dangerous than cars is when some stupid phucker in a cage runs into one. The last time that happened to me I was geared up and aside from feeling like I got my ass kicked I got up and walked away. Personally I'm smart enough to wear a helmet and good gear and that saved my ass, period. Anyone with more brains than god gave a frog can figure that one out.

Guys like this sarge and that Cote guy do nothing but spout off the same old bullschit that's been disproved a thousand times and the same dumb phucks buy it everytime, then when some kid gets his brains scrambled on the 6 o'clock news the rest of the sheep jump up about dangerous motorcycles. That's what leads to repressive legislation.

Give a politician a problem to solve and he's going to do it, just wear the damn things and drop back under the radar