[BrowningBAR]

KP, currently, from the grave, H. L. Mencken is taking a shot gun to the theory of "Those who can -- do. Those who can't -- teach."

 

[BrowningBAR]

Please expand on this.

 

[BrowningBAR]

Re: Well it didn't take long. kpaul's short rebuttal

Clever.

 

[BrowningBAR]

Well, the facts and data are that when you end you article with "For those of us who aren't fascinated with debating the maintenance of obsolete V-Twin valves, read more..." you are obviously trying to troll.



"There he goes again" Reagan voice.

 

[BrowningBAR]

And one really slow learner...

 

[BrowningBAR]

"Even when I agree with you ,you seem stupid."

-Nice.



But yes, very entertaining.

 

[BrowningBAR]

So if you feel the v-4 is so great, than why does it have such a low score on your Performance Index. And why would an obsolete V-Twin be ahead of it?



Suzuki GSX-R750 100.00

Buell Firebolt 88.20

Honda Interceptor 72.01

 

[BrowningBAR]

75lbs, $105, and 5 horses = 16.19 points?

 

[BrowningBAR]

But it is "kpaul Price Performance Index" not "kpaul Price Performance sportbike Index"



The '06 600RR is listed at 361. The Interceptor (sans ABS) is at 470. And how does this relate to the Buell having a 16.19 points higher than the VFR with nearly the same price and horsepower. Wouldn't your price performance include actual performance other than power output and lap time since your index is not race oriented?