Motorcycle Forums banner

One Racer's Opinion Regarding The Future Of AMA Superbike

21226 Views 163 Replies 24 Participants Last post by  eddyline
first! AMA Superbike racing is already dead..
141 - 160 of 164 Posts
Re: Thanks for the constructive criticism

" totally devoid of all reasonable arguments.."

Oh, bullshyt. I've given plenty of reasonable arguments and asked you reasonable questions. You just choose to ignore them. Look again.
Re: This intelligent post of LightninRVF750 needs more visibility

Did you link my response, too?

Honda abandoning the V-4 for production racing is commonly attributed to the high cost, complexity and weight. The 1-liter Ducs were kicking the shyte out of everyone in WBSK for the better part of a decade so Honda got wise and and built the

RC-51 1000cc twin. Besides, the I-4s were delivering similar performance to the V-4s at a lower cost. You know what the RC-30 and 45 cost? They were hardly production bikes that you were likely to stroll down to your dealer and buy. They were high-priced, high-spec, low-production homolgation specials. I think they made a lot more money on the 51 and the CBRs.

Furthermore, you think Honda was happy about only one AMA and WSBK title for the V-4s in the '90s? I doubt it with the amount of money they spent. Then once the rules changed, they saw the writing on the wall and ditched the V-4. The rules dictated that they change direction. Just like the new MotoGP rules have made V-4s more appealing to them again.

That said, I'd love to see some new V-4s, but tell me again how V-4s are inherently superior to other engine configurations?
See less See more
Go to the gym... You need to let loose man... You are all tight... Go get laid or something.
You are forgetting something ace

"The 1-liter Ducs were kicking the shyte out of everyone in WBSK for the better part of a decade so Honda got wise and and built the "

There was this little thing called the 250cc deficit all 4 cylinder bike had compared to the V-Twins..
Why don't you try responding to my allegedly non-existent points, man.
Where do I start?
Well thank Ducati and the Evil V-Twin for getting us away from that.
Just jump right in anywhere you want, pally.
Re: Excellent Point Thanks

Absolutely. I am D in the DiSC personality profile index.
Re: Talk about faulty logic read this and then read my response to seruzawa

Kook bashing sorry you get no response
Re: Slow down there, killer

Really giving that copy 'n' paste a workout, ain'tcha?
Re: Well it didn't take long. kpaul's short rebuttal

I fully acknowledge I could be wrong on any opinion that I have. But, as you claim of me being wrong, I am sure you can specify in what particular point. Or maybe you can´t.

Can you?

I am not saying its the problem of education but perhaps you should have taken more debating classes. Mind is such a terrible thing to waste. And in some cases, and I don´t want to start pointing fingers here, shortride, waste is such a terrible thing to mind.

- cruiz-euro
Re: This intelligent post of LightninRVF750 needs more visibility

Actually, I thought they dropped it because it was being regulated out of competition. Much like the RB-engine-based Chrysler Race Hemi.

Could be wrong - I've been wrong before - will be again...........
Where do the "Choppaz" fall?
From a 50-story roof.
Sure took us a while to get to it, didn't it? Sounds like a Unified Theory of Relative Motorcyclry to me.
Re: Talk about faulty logic read this and then read my response to seruzawa

I think he did anyway.........
Re: Talk about faulty logic read this and then read my response to seruzawa

Yeah Baby!
Get down with O-C-D (Yeah, you know me!)

Get down with O-C-D (Yeah, you know me!)

'Cuz I gots O-C-D (Why can't you see?!)
141 - 160 of 164 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top