"If the media decides to take on motorcycles as a safety issue then we are truly screwed. Luckily for us a lot of people in the media ride motorcycles too."
--It doesnt matter if the media rides or not. The media/celebs have just a wee bit of an elitist attitude. The "do as we say, not what we do". They feel they know whats good for us and they are far more capable than the general public. So its just fine that they have turbine powered bikes as long as the general population cant get a hold of them.
Same goes for firearms and environmentalism. How many times have you heard a congressmen/celeb/reporter preach on about the evils of firearms, water conservation, land management, large trucks, and SUVs and it turns out that assclown has a lush green 100 acre residence with two pool, 3 Escalades, and a CCW. And when it does come out they usually spin it as if they are more important.
I remember talking with a co-worker that was a BIG environmentalist. We were driving to lunch and we were talking about cars and she said "you know, if I could afford one, Id by one of those Hummers."
Now this was a few years ago, so she wasnt pointing to the new H3. Were talking the older Hummers that get 10-12 miles to the gallon.
I told her "how could this be? They were just ranked as one of the worst environmental autos out on the road?!"
And she said, "Yeah, but if I was the only one aloud to have one it would be OK, since I know more about the environment than most people. I am more capable and responsible."
And that sums up the "Ban It" crowd. They think its just fine if THEY have a 200hp bike. But they just dont think you are as import/capable/smart as them so you get the hockey helmet and short bus with tinted windows.
...oh, and nice Jimmy email address you got there...
--It doesnt matter if the media rides or not. The media/celebs have just a wee bit of an elitist attitude. The "do as we say, not what we do". They feel they know whats good for us and they are far more capable than the general public. So its just fine that they have turbine powered bikes as long as the general population cant get a hold of them.
Same goes for firearms and environmentalism. How many times have you heard a congressmen/celeb/reporter preach on about the evils of firearms, water conservation, land management, large trucks, and SUVs and it turns out that assclown has a lush green 100 acre residence with two pool, 3 Escalades, and a CCW. And when it does come out they usually spin it as if they are more important.
I remember talking with a co-worker that was a BIG environmentalist. We were driving to lunch and we were talking about cars and she said "you know, if I could afford one, Id by one of those Hummers."
Now this was a few years ago, so she wasnt pointing to the new H3. Were talking the older Hummers that get 10-12 miles to the gallon.
I told her "how could this be? They were just ranked as one of the worst environmental autos out on the road?!"
And she said, "Yeah, but if I was the only one aloud to have one it would be OK, since I know more about the environment than most people. I am more capable and responsible."
And that sums up the "Ban It" crowd. They think its just fine if THEY have a 200hp bike. But they just dont think you are as import/capable/smart as them so you get the hockey helmet and short bus with tinted windows.
...oh, and nice Jimmy email address you got there...