As a longtime fantatic of the VFR, I am completely disappointed. I owned a 93 VFR (arguably the finest looking motorcycle ever made, with the gorgeous pearl white paint), then a 98 VFR800. There was a very distinct path towards a more sporting bike with the 98 makeover with a feistier engine, better handling, etc., yet it had better wind protection! It was to me, the ultimate motorcycle. I kept with lots of more powerful machinery in the twisties, yet I could ride 600 miles days with no problem.
This new version seems to have traded some utilitarianism for sake of coolness, with the VTEC crap, radical front end and high mount exhaust. Honestly, I loved that the old VFR was a bit on the bland side as a looker. The fact that my riding skills could overcome the power differential between me and an R1 in the mountains was truly wonderful! The torque that allowed me to trounce an R6 in the quarter on my "sport tourer" was a work of art!
But now, making it look too sporty just makes it stand out, and the expectation that this is a superbike becomes unrealistic. I've been a devout V4 fan for as long as I've been riding. I've owned 6 bikes, all Hondas, and all V4s up to now. I switched to a VTR1000. Why? Because it stays true to its roots as a canyon carving machine with a stompin motor. It doesnt try to be anything that it's not. Its powerband is low and mean. It wheelies with ease. It doesn't have to be revved to the moon to get the power. And it is unusual in the land of inline sporty bikes. I've always loved and defended Hondas V4 design. I can no longer do that. No gear driven cams??? What's next, no single swingarm?? Come on Honda. You've had many years to boost the displacement of the VFR. All your competition is doing it, and you simply cannot substitute the displacement disadvantage you have with the Aprilia Futura, Triumph Sprint ST, etc., with a few techno gadgets, and raising the exhaust. Shame on you Honda... You missed the mark, and soiled the good name of the VFR.
This new version seems to have traded some utilitarianism for sake of coolness, with the VTEC crap, radical front end and high mount exhaust. Honestly, I loved that the old VFR was a bit on the bland side as a looker. The fact that my riding skills could overcome the power differential between me and an R1 in the mountains was truly wonderful! The torque that allowed me to trounce an R6 in the quarter on my "sport tourer" was a work of art!
But now, making it look too sporty just makes it stand out, and the expectation that this is a superbike becomes unrealistic. I've been a devout V4 fan for as long as I've been riding. I've owned 6 bikes, all Hondas, and all V4s up to now. I switched to a VTR1000. Why? Because it stays true to its roots as a canyon carving machine with a stompin motor. It doesnt try to be anything that it's not. Its powerband is low and mean. It wheelies with ease. It doesn't have to be revved to the moon to get the power. And it is unusual in the land of inline sporty bikes. I've always loved and defended Hondas V4 design. I can no longer do that. No gear driven cams??? What's next, no single swingarm?? Come on Honda. You've had many years to boost the displacement of the VFR. All your competition is doing it, and you simply cannot substitute the displacement disadvantage you have with the Aprilia Futura, Triumph Sprint ST, etc., with a few techno gadgets, and raising the exhaust. Shame on you Honda... You missed the mark, and soiled the good name of the VFR.